* When do you usually upload a new post
in your blog? I want to know
whether there is something as a schedule for it or not.
I usually post to my site three days a
week, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I started my site, I
think I was posting every day of the week! I refer to this period
as "the honeymoon phase", when I was so much in love with my
weblog that I didn't want to spend any time apart from it. After a
few months I began posting only Monday through Friday. In
November, 2001 I began writing my book, and I introduced a
schedule of posting only three days a week (Monday, Wednesday, and
Friday). I am still on that schedule, and I must say that I enjoy
the free time this allows me.
By the way, my way of posting is rather
unusual. Most people add entries to their sites as they think of
them, several over the course of the day. I have always done my
site all at once, so I post a series of posts all at one time
rather than throughout the day. I collect
interesting posts all the time, but I save them on a special page
and then go through and select the ones I want to write about when
I prepare an update.
* Or if ever has happened for you that
have not published anything for a long period of time?
I think the longest I ever went without
posting was three weeks. I often stop posting for a week or two,
if I'm visiting my family or at a conference. I just announce on
my site that I will be away from my computer, and point to a few
good weblogs to keep my readers entertained in my absence. I think
it's important to take a break once in a while, and I have no
interest in being a slave to my weblog.
* What was the deriving point for you to
activate your blog?
I started my weblog in April 1999. Two
things prompted me to do it. First, I was working at two desks and
I wanted to put my list of bookmarks up on the Web so I could
access them from any computer. Many of the pages of links on my
site today are based on those links.
Second, I had just witnessed the formation of the weblog
community, and I was in love with weblogs. Everytime I read one, I
thought "I could do that!" I was already sending my friends
numerous links every day in email. Starting a weblog was simple: I
just put those same
links (and my opinion) on the Web instead of emailing them.
* How did it happen the increase of your
blog readers and visitors?
The first thing was that one of the
existing weblogs found my site and linked to me one week after I
started, so that introduced me to the weblog community. Since
then, I've been featured on numerous radio shows and quoted in
many news articles, but I have to say, quite
honestly, that I get very little traffic from those things--and
the traffic I get usually looks at my site once out of curiousity,
and then never comes back.
I believe my traffic has grown primarily
through word-of-mouth and through links from other weblogs. Weblog
audiences tend to be small and to grow slowly, but they will grow
if you continue to update your site regularly. My audience is
still not as big as many of the star
bloggers, but it continues to grow steadily, and I am grateful for
every single person who comes to read my site.
* And if you have any profession in
journalism before blogging?
No. I have an English degree, but I had
not had any writing jobs before I started my site.
* Do you have any information about
non-English blogs, specially Iranian ones?
I have seen Chinese weblogs, Spanish
weblogs, French weblogs, Hebrew weblogs, Iranian weblogs, and
Dutch weblogs. When I went to the Blogtalk conference in Vienna, I
was introduced to Polish weblogs, Romanian weblogs, German
weblogs, and many others. It seems that there are weblogs across
the world, wherever people can get to a computer
with an Internet connection, there are weblogs. Blogcount
<http://dijest.com/bc/> is
trying to discover how many weblogs there are worldwide. I would
guess that today there are between 500,000 and 1 million, but the
actual figure is anyone's guess.
* How do you think about the structure
of a blog?
I define a weblog as a frequently
updated website, with entries arranged in reverse-chronological
order. Beyond that, a weblog can be about anything and everything.
Whatever people care about, they will post on their weblog. That
might be their jobs, their family, the
news, or their gardens.
* It is not bad to have a talk about the
parameters that make a regular personal web page, a blog.
The main difference is in the format.
There are lots of kinds of web pages, but a weblog is easy to
maintain, and because it's updated so frequently, people have a
reason to come back every day.
* Have you ever done any classifications
for your notes? Or you think that a blogger is better to write
freely about anything. How do you think about the bloggers who try
to have blogs with special and fixed subjects (i.e. blogs
dedicated to technical IT issues or the ones we saw during the
late middle east war: war-logs)?
I like to write about whatever is on my
mind, but I think there is room for all kinds of weblogs. I know
many people who have created strong professional reputations for
themselves through their weblogs by posting about issues that
affect their professions. These people vary in their approach:
some limit themselves to post only about their professions, and
others allow themselves the liberty to post about other topics as
they wish. I do think that anyone attempting to use a weblog to
enhance their professional reputation should be aware that
potential employers and clients might be reading, and to make sure
that the majority of material is in some way related to their
field.
I think weblogs that focus on only on
topic provide a great service for the reader. There is so much
information published on the Web every day. Having one place that
will collect articles that are related to one subject is a great
time saver for readers who are interested in the subject. So I
encourage anyone who is passionate about a subject to create a
weblog about that topic.
But it is up to the individual blogger.
I tell people to write about what interests them most. If you are
obsessed with one subject, make that the focus of your site. If
you would get bored posting only on one subject, then make a
general interest weblog and post about the many things you are
interested in. Or create or join a group weblog (like
www.command-post.org, for example) and contribute posts about one
subject of interest to that site.
* What is your opinion about trying to
form a real community of bloggers, a community that tries to keep
on the social and informational rights of its members? Do you
think that it is possible or useful to do so?
To some extent, bloggers have always
looked out for each other, even without a formal organization.
Most bloggers will inform another blogger if their site design has
been stolen, or if someone is plagiarizing their material. So I
don't know if I think a formal organization of bloggers is
necessary or would be attractive to members of the community. As
it is, I think most bloggers feel a kinship with other webloggers,
and because of that, they look out for each other.
I have heard suggestions that there
should be a code of ethics for weblogs--in fact, I wrote one
myself
<http://www.rebeccablood.net/handbook/excerpts/weblog_ethics.html>
And there may be the need for bloggers who aspire to practice
journalism with their weblogs to form a professional organization
that will agree on standards of conduct, and provide a distinction
between blogger-journalists and others. Most events can issue
press releases
to a very limited number of people, so this distinction will be
crucial for anyone who wishes to practice journalism via their own
publication, rather than for a more established organization.
* Would you please give a complementary
explanation on the last few sentences in your answer? I myself
need some more explanation to see your meaning well.
I mean, event planners usually issue
press releases only to members of the working press. Even
established free-lance writers can have trouble gaining access to
press conferences, and other newsworthy events unless they can
demonstrate that they are under contract with an
established news organization to cover a particular event.
Bloggers, though they may be experts, will probably have a hard
time gaining equal access to such events. It's possible that the
existence of a professional organization of blogger-reporters
might provide some credibility to bloggers who aspire to be
journalists, and thus help them gain the access they need to
really report the news.
* By the way, I exactly wanted to ask
you about the possibility and usability of bloggers real community
as a team or a band with bolder social identity, not necessarily
establishing a professional organization.
With regard to social groups of
bloggers, there are many groups like that already in the United
States, and I believe in some other countries as well. Some use <http://blog.meetup.com/>
to arrange local meetings on the third wednesday of every month.
Other bloggers have formed local groups like NYC Bloggers <http://www.nycbloggers.com/>
and DFW Bloggers <http://www.dfwblogs.com/>
in order to keep in touch and bring their online friendships into
the real world. Though I don't belong to such a group, most of the
people I know where I now live have weblogs--that's how I know
them. Many people don't realize that the social connections that
are created by weblogs are often carried over into the real world.
* I hope you are not bothered by my
miscellaneous and numerous questions. I have to say my deep
friendly words of being thankful, because of your kindness and
providing me a new and different journalistic experience.
I'm looking for incoming days of friendship and other good
fortunes for counterpart-ship.
I am so happy to be featured in your
magazine.